Sociocultural Pragmatic Differences of Complaining in English Shushanik Paronyan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU.B/2026.17.1.100Keywords:
Pragmatics, Speech Act Theory, politeness principles, complaining, direct/indirect speech actsAbstract
Being a sociocultural phenomenon, language enables people to communicate to other members of the society as well as to one’s inner self. By analyzing verbal behavior, or the communicative aspect of language, Pragmatics highlighted the necessity to reckon certain extralinguistic factors when creating meaning, such as the speakers’ intents, communicative goals, personal attitudes and feeling, as well as their sociocultural characteristics. The aim of this paper is to investigate the communicative-pragmatic peculiarities of complaint in English. Complaint is placed among Expressives, a class of speech acts that state what the speaker feels. On the illocutionary level, complaints express negative emotional message, the complainers’ disapproval about a certain situation or dissatisfaction with some state of affairs. The research of the practical material carried out in this paper shows that complaints, like other speech acts, can be phrased with the help of direct and indirect speech acts. Having an adversative illocutionary content, complaint depends heavily on the principles of politeness that govern the process of communication. The research attempts to illustrate how certain social factors affect the language choice by the speakers in the process of complaining.
References
1. Austin J.L., How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.
2. Boxer D., Social Distance and Speech Behavior: The Case of Indirect Complaints// Journal of Pragmatics, North-Holland, 1993, 19, pp. 103-125. See p. 109. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223828292_Social_distance_and_speech_behavior_The_case_of_indirect_complaints
3. Brown P., Levinson S. C., Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987
4. Culpeper J., Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
5. Frijda N.H., The Laws of Emotion//American Psychologist, May 1988, 43(5), pp.349-358. See p. 351.
6. House J., Kasper, G., Politeness markers in English and German. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational Routine, Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton, 1981, pp. 157-186.
7. Ifantidou E., Pragmatic competence and relevance. John Benjamins. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2014. Kecskes I., Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press, 2013.
8. Laforest M., Scenes of Family Life: Complaining in Everyday Conversation// Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 34, Issues 10–11, October–November 2002, pp. 1595-1620.
9. Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics. Longman, London, 1983.
10. Mao T. He Sh., An Integrated Approach to Pragmatic Competence: Its Framework and Properties// SAGE Open, April-June 2021 11(2), pp. 1–13. 2SAGE OpenApril-June 2021: 1 –13. DOI: 10.1177/21582440211011472. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358580291_An_integrated_approach_to_pragmatic_competence_Its_framework_and_properties
11. Olshtain, E., Weinbach, L, Interlanguage features of the speech act of complaining// Interlanguage Pragmatics, 1993, 22, pp. 108-123, See p. 108.
12. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford University press, 2006, p. 295.
13. Paronyan Sh., Rostomyan A., On the Interrelation between Cognitive and Emotional Minds in Speech// Armenian Folia Anglistika, 1(8), Yerevan, 2011, pp. 26-34.
14. Paronyan Sh., Rostomyan A., The Pragmatic Impact of Background Emotional Memory on Interpersonal Relations. Armenian Folia Anglistika, 2 (9), Yerevan, 2011, pp. 7-15.
15. Searle J., A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts,’ in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1975, pp. 344–369.
16. Trosborg, A. Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints, and Apologies. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, 1995.
17. 15 Play Scripts That Deal with Difficult Family. Marin Nathalie, “Jesse’s Inappropriate Behavior” Act 3. https://shortplayscripts.com/play-script-about-family-problems-and-violence-7-characters/
18. Verschueren J.,Understanding Pragmatics. London, New York et al., Arnold, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shushanik Paronyan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.